Critical2
Can change planning results
Workspace assurance
Data Confidence Center
Find workbook issues that could change availability, lead-time, or reporting results.
0/100
Import confidence
Setup required
Planwise checks identity, coverage, freshness, mappings, and capacity before you rely on scheduling recommendations.
People match 0%Schedule match 0%Through no schedule date
Warnings0
Review before reporting
Information0
Optional data improvements
Passed checks10
No action required
Diagnostic queue
What needs attention
Issues are prioritized by their potential effect on availability and lead-time results.
criticalcoveragePeople workbook is missing
Skills, departments, tags, and contact identity cannot be validated.
1
criticalcoverage
People workbook is missing
Skills, departments, tags, and contact identity cannot be validated.
Recommended action
Import the latest People workbook before relying on planning results.
Affected records
- People workbook
criticalcoverageSchedule workbook is missing
Availability and lead-time calculations do not have a schedule grid.
1
criticalcoverage
Schedule workbook is missing
Availability and lead-time calculations do not have a schedule grid.
Recommended action
Import the latest Schedule workbook containing SCHEDULED rows and dated columns.
Affected records
- Schedule workbook
How confidence is calculated
Critical issues carry the greatest weight, followed by warnings and informational gaps. The score is guidance—not a replacement for reviewing the source workbooks.
View scoring safeguards
- Missing workbooks or expired schedule dates force a setup or attention state.
- Missing schedule cells are never assumed to mean availability.
- Duplicate identity and capacity conflicts receive the strongest deductions.
- All checks run locally and the issue list is not uploaded.