Critical2
Can change planning results
Workspace assurance
Data Confidence Center
Find workbook issues that could change availability, lead-time, or reporting results.
Loading workspace…
Planwise
Workspace assurance
Find workbook issues that could change availability, lead-time, or reporting results.
Loading workspace…
Import confidence
Planwise checks identity, coverage, freshness, mappings, and capacity before you rely on scheduling recommendations.
Can change planning results
Review before reporting
Optional data improvements
No action required
Operational validation
These checks look beyond workbook structure for suspicious roster, identity, capability, workload, and capacity patterns. They are review signals—not automatic corrections.
The current workspace did not trigger any of the operational anomaly rules.
Recovery & support
Check the local recovery path and download a privacy-safe support bundle when troubleshooting. Raw People/Schedule records, issue record names, audit actors, and source filenames are excluded by default.
Checking browser storage, rollback history, and production health…
Identity reconciliation
Use a manual link only after verifying that two records are the same consultant. Overrides apply only to the current paired import batch.
Automatic IDs/emails/names and any verified manual links reconcile the current People and Schedule batch safely.
Change attribution
High-impact local actions are recorded chronologically so imports, rollbacks, reconciliations, calculation rules, holiday mappings, and full restores remain explainable.
High-impact actions performed after this milestone is installed will appear here.
Diagnostic queue
Issues are prioritized by their potential effect on availability and lead-time results.
Skills, departments, tags, and contact identity cannot be validated.
Import the latest People workbook before relying on planning results.
Availability and lead-time calculations do not have a schedule grid.
Import the latest Schedule workbook containing SCHEDULED rows and dated columns.
Critical issues carry the greatest weight, followed by warnings and informational gaps. The score is guidance—not a replacement for reviewing the source workbooks.